Socrates vs Confucius Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Socrates vs Confucius - Essay Example The difference in the attitude towards the means of solving the issues disturbing society came out of the peculiarities if historical preconditions and the period they lived in. Both Socrates and Confucius at the time of significant social changes accompanied by frequent wars, as well as society demoralization and political perturbations. Socrates witnessed florescence of Greece as Pericles was in reign, as well as did he see its overwhelming defeat in the Peloponnesian wars and severe rule of the Thirty Tyrants. Confucius lived at the time when the traditional slave-owning system was on the verge of decline while various political powers were fighting for power. All these factors lead to crises, and the philosophers tried to find a way to understand them and their origins and tackle them mending the social structure. Basically, this was the main common aim of Socrates and Confucius.The principal difference between them lay in the way they chose to treat the issue. The view on human nature and morality is considered to be theoretical basis of their teachings. Socrates shifted focus from speculations about the afterlife, the gods and the nature to meditation on how to live in this world. He saw the solution of a problem in reason. Reason is what can open the essence of a â€Å"paragon† for order; what we wish to create should be first developed in our mind. Socrates’ famous admonition â€Å"Know thyself† implies the importance of knowledge in human affairs.

Why the road measures still fail and how can it be improved Research Paper

Why the road measures still fail and how can it be improved - Research Paper Example Road measures are organized safety processes intended at reducing the number and severity of road related crashes. Effective road measures systems provide information for selecting and implementing successful road safety strategies and projects. Different actors are involved in road safety measures; it is vital for their activities to be well coordinated to address the common problem in an integrated way. These actors include the road infrastructure element, which involves the guidelines and standards that manage the planning, design, construction, and operation of the road. Infrastructure component also includes the directional and traffic control signs, road side barriers, as well as signal and pavement markings (United States, 2004). The other actor involved in road safety measures is the vehicle component. In this component legislation, regulations and standards that govern the manufacture and maintenance of automobiles, buses, trucks, motorcycles, and their associated equipments are looked considered. The third actor is the user component. The road user component includes the regulation and public education that governs and provides information on the behavior of drivers, occupants, cyclists, as well as pedestrians (Transportation Research Board, 2002). The United States is missing noteworthy opportunities to lessen traffic fatalities and injuries. Most other high income countries are reducing traffic fatalities and fatality rates faster than in the United States. Some countries that experienced higher fatality rates than the U.S 20 years ago are now below the U.S rate. For instance, from 1995 to 2009, France declined its annual traffic fatality by 52 percent, Australia by 25 percent, United Kingdom by 39 percent but only 19 percent in the United States (United States, 2004) From the experience of these nations, for a national program to function